The
Daily Leader (Toronto), Thursday, 17 May, 1855
Grand Trunk Railway
SOME NOTES OF A VISIT TO THE WORKS OF THE GRANDTRUNK
RAILWAY, WEST OF TORONTO, FEBRUARY 1855
By Fred Cumberland, Esq.,
Chief Engineer of the Ontario, Simcoe and Huron Railway.
(Read before the Canadian Institute, March 31st)
Having been favored some short time since with
an invitation to join a part of gentlemen on a private inspection
of the work in course of execution on the Grand Trunk Railway
of Canada, west of Toronto, I availed myself of an opportunity
I had long desired, and having seen much that interested, and,
I confess, surprised me, I thought some descriptive notes of the
more interesting points upon the line might be acceptable to the
Institute; and accordingly I propose (without entering upon any
close or technical criticism), to offer to your notice this evening
the memoranda I have preserved in connection with the principal
objects which attracted my attention. Works of this nature seem
amongst us to be objects of general interest only, at the time
of their initiation, or when, being completed, we discover that
they are of some importance to us; or, if it be otherwise,the
interest which they attract is too frequently founded on a restless
spirit of suspicion -- a wilful faculty too prevalent amongst
some of us for adopting a system of depreciation, instead of (what
my experience teaches me would be the wiser one) of encouragement
and support.
When I started on my visit, therefore, I had
not been prepared by rumor to tied very much to gratify or surprise
me, and as I think in part of the business of this Institute to
trace out and follow, as far as the opportunities of its members
will admit, the progress and the manner of the public works constructing
about us, it may not be altogether unprofitable perhaps if I acquaint
you with what is doing on this line.
Most of us are acquainted with the system of
construction adopted by the Province as the standard of the Grand
Trunk Railway -- that it is one of more substantial character
than had previously obtained either in the United States or Canada,
founded indeed on the British system, so far qualified and lowered,
however, as was necessary to economy, yet consistent with stability
and permanence. The first illustration of this standard of any
moment is to be found in the Humber Viaduct; 8.5 miles from Toronto,
over their river and valley of that name. At the point of crossing,
the valley (extremely picturesque in character), is 1500 feet
wide between bold and precipitous banks giving an elevation of
68.0 to grade line above the stream. The viaduct consists of 8
piers and 2 abutments, giving 9 spans of 60 feet each, and a total
length of structure of 560 feet, the remainder of the crossing
being effected by embankments containing some 80,000 yards of
material. The piers are of white brick on stone foundations, and
will be spanned by wrought iron girders, the weight of metal in
which will be somewhere about 150 tons. The construction of these
girders being identical throughout the line (except for larger
spans than those now mentioned) it may be well here to explain
briefly that the gauge being 5.6 the girders are placed 7.6 from
centre to centre, the top and bottom flanges being 2.0 wide and
the main web 4.2 in height, so that the clear width between the
girders is identical with the gauge of the road. Across, projecting
over and attached to these are heavy timber beams -- upon which
are laid the trackstrings -- the whole width of the floor being
16.0 feet, the track occupying the centre and having a pathway
on each side of it protected by handrails. It would be difficult
to imagine a more simple or satisfactory system of construction
than this, and on contemplating it one cannot help reverting with
some regret to those not very distant times, (only immediately
previous indeed to Stephenson and Fairbairn's enquiries in relation
to the Menai Bridge), when the crossing of such a valley as the
Humber would have been effected by a structure involving much
more intricacy of design, vastly more material, and far heavier
expense. There is one consideration, however, which may qualify
our lamentations on past labours lost, and it is this, that although
economically these structures are far more satisfactory than those
in which engineers but recently indulged, they are undoubtedly
less pleasing to the eye and altogether injurious as in connection
with the picturesque, for their outline consists of two hard horizontal
lines, without relief, break or beauty of any description, a form
indeed which how grand soever the structures in themselves, will,
I suspect mar every landscape and paralyze the hand of the most
soulless artist.
We next came to the Mimico Valley Viaduct, 12
miles from Toronto, consisting of one centrespan of 60 and two
sides of 30 feet each, giving a full length of structure of 162
feet, 28 feet above water line, and together, with an embankment
of some 30,000 yards, constituting a crossing of 600 feet in length.
The next work of importance is that in the valley
of the Etobicoke at Brampton, 20 miles from Toronto, which is
1500 feet wide, having two girder bridges of 60 feet span each.
At 27 miles from Toronto we come to the most
important structure of the line, forming the crossing of the valley
of the River Credit, 2000 feet in width between the banks. It
consists of 8 spans of 96 feet each, giving a full length of structure
of 921 feet, the remainder of the crossing being by embankment
containing about 150,00 yards of material, about half of which
is from a cut on the west side in indurated clay similar to the
specimen which I present.
The piers and abutments of this structure are
constructed entirely of a very beautiful quality of sandstone
of fine close and hard grit, and of a very agreeable warm color.
This stone is brought by tramroad from the Georgetown quarries,
4 miles distant, and as it has attracted much attention recently
as a material available for Toronto works. I have secured a specimen
for your inspection. Of this the piers and abutments are constructed
in courses rising from 2.6. to 18. in height, with self face,
quarter beds and joints and bold 3. drove arises at the external
angles, with two bold plinth courses and tooled capping for girders.
These masses of masonry, of a description unsurpassed
by anything I had previously seen in Canada, rise to a height
of 115 feet above the water line, and this in connection with
the great length (nearly 1,000 feet) results in an effect which
is grand in the extreme, although of course the appearance is
marred as yet by the incompleteness of the structure, the presence
of temporary trustlework and the want of unity which the absence
of the girders begets. On enquiry I find that the masonry, when
complete, will consist of 13,000 cubic yards, and the weight of
the wrought iron girders 405 tons. Much as one is gratified on
a first view of the Humber viaduct on seeing that at the Credit
one is tempted to regret the necessity existing there for the
use of brick; for the Georgetown stone, built in the bold style
adopted at the Credit, gives such complete assurance to the mind
of permanent stability, and such satisfaction to the eye by the
play of color on its face that it tends to dissatisfy one with
a material in itself unimpeachable but relatively inferior. The
girders to be used at the viaduct being of 96 feet span are of
different construction to those we have already described. Instead
of the two single web girders as at the Humber, here we have single
tubular girders, 7.0 high and 7.0 wide, with the track on the
top of it and projecting side paths as before, giving a full width
of floor of 16.0, each girder weighing somewhere about 50 tons.
In the same style of masonry and of material
from the same quarries we came at about a mile further westward,
to a 25 foot arched culvert, with a vertical height of 60. to
springing, and containing I was told, about 3,000 cubic yards,
with an embankment over of about 194,000 yards, crossing a valley
1,500 feet wide. I observed here an excellent expedient for securing
a double use to those culver's, for after allowing sufficient
height for the passage of the stream, by making a set off on the
face of each side wall a bearing is obtained, joisting laid and
planked, and a roadway thus provided above the waterway. We subsequently
visited a 15 foot arched culvert of similar character 1.5 miles
further westward, coming, at about 31 miles from Toronto, to what
is called "The Lindsey cut," a work which has given
much trouble in consequence of the character of the material --
hard cemented gravel -- through which it is made. Of this I have
secured a specimen, and although probably most of us have encountered
material somewhat approaching it in difficulty of working, few
of us have been tried by a cut in it such as this, 50 feet in
depth and containing 173,000 yards.
In succession to this cut and immediately beyond
it we entered another 60 feet in depth, containing, we were told,
about 25,000 yards, in limestone rock, of excellent hydraulic
quality, the cement from which, setting somewhat slowly but with
great tenacity and hardness, has been generally used throughout
the works.
Immediately beyond this again, after passing
over the embankment filled from these cuts, we came to another
(called Scots) which, contained upwards of 182,000 yards, it was
a relief to find, of pure sand, although as it approached to quick,
it seemed to give some indication of trouble.
Passing a 15 feet arched culvert similar to those
already described, at 36.5 miles, we reached the summit between
Toronto and Guelph, which is 991 feet above the level of Lake
Ontario. Here is a cut in indurated gravel from which some 36,000
yards have been taken.
Three miles further westward is another 25 feet
arched culvert, built in limestone of highly fossiliated character.
The style of this masonry was even heavier than that of those
previously visited, but like those, it was finished with bold
self faces and drave arrises, the arch stones being,if I remember
rightly, tooled. I name this because I think this style of masonry
highly applicable to works of this nature, and far superior (by
reason of the play about the face, relieved as it is by the wide
arises which define the strict outline of all angles) to any higher
finish or tooled faces which in my judgement impart tameness when
adopted to massive structures.
At 40 miles from Toronto we come to the Eramosa
Valley Viaduct over the river of this name and near the Village
of Rockwood. The full width of this structure is 570 feet, comprising
8 spans of 60 feet each, the full width of valley being 1,200
feet, crossed at an elevation of 45 feet above water line. The
stone used in this structure is obtained in the immediate vicinity;
the whole district around it, on the east side of the river, presenting
a bare broken face of highly fossiliated limestone rock, abounding,
we are told, in caverns of large capacity and interesting character,
well worthy of the visit, which want of time obliged us to decline.
At Eramosa the style of masonry consists with that of the other
structures, but the color of the stone, which varies from grey
to purple, and passes in parts into a lighter ocbreous tint gives
it a distinctive and peculiar aspect as compared with the other
viaducts, and one which, altho' preferred by some of my companions,
I did not admire so much as the warm and even face of the Georgetown
material.
The quantity of stone laid in the Eramosa structure,
(the masonry of which is fully completed), was 5000 yards, the
embankment, connected with it containing 80,000, and the weight
of the metal in the girders being about 125 tons.
Passing on to Guelph, (where the road seems to
me to have been located somewhat strangely, although doubtless
with good reason, right through the heart of the town), we find
the most peculiar structure on the whole line, and one indeed
for which few, if any, precedents can be found. This peculiarity
is due to the crossing of the Speed River at right angles on and
over the line of a street which is approached at each end and
on each side by the river by other streets, also at right angles.
In crossing the river therefore at this point it was necessary
to preserve the common road on the same side as that to be occupied
by the railway and to connect that roadway at each end with the
streets abutting upon it. This has been effected by the viaduct
in question,which is 580 feet in length, comprising six spans
of 60 and one centre span over the river of 80 feet. But instead
of solid piers of the usual width, there are two rows of piers,
leaving a transverse opening of twenty feet wide between them,
spanned by short transverse wrought iron beams to receive the
longitudinal girders or tubes in the direction of the rail and
roadway, so that throughout the length of some 600 feet the railway
will be above the road, for which a headway of about 20 feet will
be left clear of the transverse beams before mentioned; in fact,
except that this work is on terra firma, it illustrates the same
conditions of use as the new Suspension Bridge at Niagara, with
the carriage way immediately beneath the rail road. That any local
necessity exists for retaining the road in its old position or
for forcing the location of the railway to its site is not very
apparent, but Municipalities are not always as considerate as
they should be, and seem sometimes disposed to test their strength
by the pressure of some unreasonable prejudice.
At 53.5 miles from Toronto, and 6 miles beyond
Guelph, we visited what is called the "Jack Hillcut,"
in indurated clay and hard pan, of a depth of 40 feet, and contents
of 161,000 yards. So close and compact is this material that the
sides of the gully stand for the full 40 feet at a perfectly fair
and vertical face; and I traced on part of it which had been excavated
from nearly two years since, the marks of the pick as sharp and
clean as though they had been recently made rather than stood
exposure for two winters.
In connection with these deep cuts, I availed
myself of the opportunity for noticing the effects of the then
recent heavy fall of snow in relation to the probable obstruction
of traffic. The general depth of snow over the surface of the
country was from two or three feet, and it drifted very considerable
in places, sufficient to illustrate fully the circumstances of
our average winters. I found almost universally that cuts from
5 to 15 feet were comparatively choked by drift, and that as the
depth above 20 or 25 feet increased, the deposit was diminished.
In the cut at Jack's hill, 40 feet in depth, although the snow
was two feet deep at the summit of the sides, there was certainly
not more than from 2 to 4 inches in the bottom. This result has
been attributed to active passage of the wind through the cut,
although of course much must depend upon its direction as in relation
to the bearing of the cut.
At 57.5 miles from Toronto we came to the Grand
River Viaduct, consisting of three land spans of 60 feet each,
and two over the river of 96 feet each. The full width of the
valley is 2500 feet, of which the structure occupies 440 feet,
the remainder consisting of an embankment containing 130,000 cubic
yards, the grade line being at an elevation of 47 feet above the
water. The piers and abutments are constructed of a grey limestone
(from quarries in the township of Puslinch, 12 miles south-eastward
from the works), and built of the same class as I have before
described, the quantity of stone laid being 4000 cubic yards,
and the weight of the metal in girders some 200 tons.
This was the last structure of importance which
we visited. Passing through Petersburgh, however, we gained a
point about 86 miles from Toronto which is the summit of the whole
road, and 1003 feet above the level of Lake Ontario and 664 feet
above Lake Huron. These levels give a difference in altitude above
the sea of 339 feet between Lakes Ontario and Huron, and this
difference consists, within one foot, of that ascertained by the
surveys of the Northern Railroad Company extended from Toronto
to the Georgian Bay.
It does not, however, agree with Bayfield's observations
as published in Scobie's maps, -- where the difference is shown
to be 361 feet. The railway profiles, checked as they have been
by each other, will probably be accepted as the more reliable,
especially when we remember that Bayfield traced his levels through
the St. Clair River, where we may conclude he made this error
in exaggerating the fall.
Immediately to the southward of the summit, in
the Township of Wilmot, and two miles west of Petersburgh, is
a mound known a Earl's Hill, said to be the highest point in Western
Canada, and ascertained by the engineer of the Guelph Railway
to be 1186 feet above Lake Ontario. I have not had an opportunity
since my visit to that point of ascertaining the height of the
Blue Mountains of Collingwood, but I am strongly disposed to believe
that their altitude is considerably in excess of the of Earl's
Hill as reported.
Such is a brief sketch, descriptive of the principal
structures and works of the Toronto and St. Mary Railway. I have
not attempted to do more than give an idea of their character,
which is so simple as almost to make their description monotonous.
One system and principle of construction being
adopted throughout, the only special exception being the Speed
Viaduct at Guelph, little remained to be told, after one had been
described, beyond the extent, capacity and materials of each.
Together they form as perfect a group of railway structure as
I ever desire to see, for whilst their simplicity satisfies the
feeling of the most prudent economy, their materials are so unexceptionable,
the character of the workmanship so excellent, and the taste of
their finish so fitting, that one is satisfied with them as works
of the most substantial permanence. For my part I confess to having
been most agreeable surprised when I found works of such a class
constructed in connection with Canadian enterprise; and whilst
the immediate object of this paper will have been served by directing
the attention of the Institute to them, I shall be better pleased
it if induces my engineering brethren to journey over the ground
which I have travelled with so much satisfaction and not a little
profit.
|