he
Daily Leader (Toronto), 5th November 1853
Wheat Growing Capabilities of
Canada
It may be of interest to persons in search of
the most productive land to know which are the countries giving
the largest returns of Wheat, Peas, and Indian Corn. They are:
| |
WHEAT, |
PEAS, |
INDIAN CORN, |
| |
P acre,a'ge. |
P acre,a'ge. |
P acre,a'ge. |
| |
P Bus. |
P Lbs. |
P Bus. |
P Lbs. |
P Bus. |
P Lbs. |
| Bruce |
20 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
| Brant |
19 |
2 |
17 |
17 |
26 |
31 |
| Halton |
18 |
53 |
14 |
23 |
30 |
18 |
| York |
18 |
39 |
18 |
52 |
22 |
15 |
| Oxford |
18 |
30 |
18 |
7 |
16 |
14 |
| Kent |
18 |
13 |
17 |
12 |
26 |
38 |
| Peel |
18 |
3 |
14 |
45 |
29 |
54 |
| Ontario |
17 |
55 |
18 |
27 |
25 |
46 |
| Haldimand |
17 |
9 |
12 |
48 |
23 |
19 |
| Elgin |
17 |
6 |
17 |
2 |
26 |
37 |
| Durham |
16 |
30 |
17 |
1 |
22 |
58 |
| Waterloo |
16 |
18 |
16 |
20 |
25 |
42 |
| Peterboro' |
16 |
15 |
16 |
9 |
25 |
27 |
| Simcoe |
16 |
9 |
17 |
2 |
15 |
7 |
The Report remarks that "the county of Prince
Edward has the largest crop of Indian Corn, viz: 30 bushels 40
lbs per acre owing probably to its situation between two large
bodies of water,which ward off the early and late frosts. The
produce of wheat in the country of Peterboro' is the nearest the
average of all Upper Canada, which is 16 bushels 14 lbs. per acre."
It would be rash to conclude that because these
counties give the largest returns, they therefore contain the
best land in the Province. The capacity of some of the best lands
in the province, lying in the Owen Sound settlement has yet to
be tested.
There are townships of which the average produce
of wheat is much greater than that of any county. The highest
averages of wheat are given by the following townships:
| TOWNSHIPS |
COUNTIES |
Bus. |
Lbs. |
| |
|
P acre,a'ge. |
| Esquesing |
Halton |
26 |
35 |
| Scarborough |
York |
24 |
3 |
| Blenheim |
Oxford |
21 |
51 |
| Oxford, West |
Oxford |
21 |
35 |
| York |
York |
21 |
5 |
| Oxford, East |
Oxford |
21 |
2 |
| Onondaga |
Brant |
20 |
40 |
| Darlington |
Durham |
20 |
32 |
| Dover |
Kent |
20 |
23 |
| Louth |
Lincoln |
20 |
17 |
| Kipcardine |
Bruce |
20 |
17 |
| Gore of Toronto |
Peel |
20 |
15 |
| Blandford |
Oxford |
20 |
12 |
| Pickering |
Ontario |
21 |
11 |
| Harwich |
Kent |
20 |
3 |
| Bruce |
Bruce |
20 |
... |
| Brant |
do. |
20 |
... |
| Greenock |
do. |
20 |
... |
| Chatham |
Kent |
19 |
48 |
| Toronto |
Peel |
19 |
45 |
| Whitby |
Ontario |
19 |
40 |
| Etobicoke |
York |
19 |
40 |
| Dorchester |
Middlesex |
19 |
37 |
| Tocumseth |
Simcoe |
19 |
36 |
| Collingwood |
Grey |
19 |
25 |
| Georgina |
Ontario |
19 |
13 |
| Westminster |
Middlesex |
19 |
10 |
| Southwold |
Elgin |
19 |
10 |
| Scugog |
Ontario |
19 |
... |
| Dumfries, South |
Brant |
18 |
56 |
| Markham |
York |
18 |
43 |
Here we have 20 bushels as the highest average
yield of wheat in any county in Upper Canada - that county being
Bruce - and 26 bushels as the highest average of any township,
Esquesing being at the head of the list. These returns give no
idea of the capabilities of the soil; for they have never been
tested on so general a scale as to include a whole township. Esquesing
was settled about 34 years ago; the eastern portion with Irish
Protestants. Another part of the township has a large Scotch settlement,
known as the "Scotch Block." On the whole this township
can boast of very good farmers, and great progress has been made
in some parts of it, where a succession of fine stone houses and
good orchards may be seen for miles together. But the soil is
not uniformly good. A pine ridge runs through part of it and a
mountain detracts from its productive capabilities. If therefore
this township gives the largest average yield of wheat, it does
not follow that its productive capacity is greater than that of
any others which have not been brought to the same point of cultivation.
Its resources have been developed to a greater extent than many
other townships; although its capacity has by no means been fully
tested. When this has been done, its average product of wheat
will range far above 26 bushels; and till other townships have
been farmed in a way to test their productive powers it would
be unfair to limit their capacity by the results before us. There
are instances in which the powers of the soil have been taxed
to their utmost extent; but of these the census takes no cognizance.
The census deals in general results; and gives us the average
product of a whole township. But if we would know not the actual
yield, under an imperfect system of farming, but the full capacity
of the soil, we must seek it in instances where this has been
tested by a high system of cultivation. For this purpose we leave
the census tables for facts which have come to our knowledge through
other channels. We have just seen a Scarboro' farmer who has grown
45 bushels of wheat to the acre. A week or two ago a farmer from
Clarke stated in this office, that he had known 60 bushels to
the acre produced in that township; and had himself grown over
50. Clarke, it will be seen, has no place in the thirty-one townships
which appear in the census table as producing the highest average
crops of wheat. We are aware too that 55 bushels per acre has
been grown in Trafalgar. These instances reveal the capabilities
of the soil, under an improved system of cultivation. But after
all they only show what can be done; without giving any ground
to hope that the intelligence and good management which led to
these results are likely to become general. It is certain, however,
that the rising generation will possess advantages of which their
fathers were deprived. The common school system is diffusing intelligence
with as near an approach to university as in most other countries.
University College has a professorship of Agriculture and the
Normal school does not neglect those practical branches of education
which are connected with the cultivation of the soil. Insome townships
cultivation is carried to a much higher point than in others;
and it follows that in some cases poor soil is made to produce
more abundantly than better land cultivated with less skill and
care. For instance, the Gore of Toronto is excellent soil; but
its average yield of wheat does not rise above 20 bushels the
acre. Its average ought certainly to be one-third greater, if
not double. The township of York, which is not nearly so good
land, has a higher average by one bushel an acre. The township
which stands second on the list in the average production of wheat-
Scarboro' - is by no means a first class township, take it all
in all; nor does it get any thing like fair play. It contains
some excellent land, but probably one third of that which lies
upon the lake is inferior, and there is a good deal of prime land
in the township. It is the township which, to a greater extent
than any other supplies this city with hay, straw, and oats; whereby
it is deprived of that manure which other townships retain and
which is essential to a high state of production. All this tends
to show how low is the average production of wheat in Upper Canada
as compared with the productive capabilities of the soil.
The Counties in the Lower Province giving the
largest return of Wheat, Peas and Oats are:
| |
WHEAT, |
PEAS, |
OATS, |
| |
P B. |
P Lbs. |
P B. |
P Lbs. |
P B. |
P Lbs. |
| Megantic |
15 |
29 |
18 |
40 |
27 |
19 |
| Quebec |
14 |
11 |
22 |
.. |
22 |
10 |
| Bonaventure |
14 |
2 |
7 |
24 |
27 |
18 |
| Champlain |
13 |
7 |
17 |
40 |
24 |
10 |
| Stanstead |
12 |
56 |
12 |
41 |
29 |
10 |
| Missisquoi |
12 |
55 |
12 |
.. |
35 |
21 |
| Ottawa |
12 |
46 |
12 |
16 |
19 |
.. |
| Beauharnois |
12 |
41 |
13 |
11 |
26 |
7 |
| Drummond |
12 |
30 |
11 |
16 |
25 |
1 |
| Two Mountains |
12 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
19 |
32 |
| Nicolet |
12 |
10 |
8 |
33 |
21 |
30 |
| Vandreuil |
11 |
48 |
14 |
47 |
22 |
33 |
| Leinster |
11 |
43 |
10 |
38 |
21 |
6 |
| Sherbrooke |
11 |
35 |
12 |
47 |
26 |
3 |
| Montmoiency |
10 |
56 |
13 |
30 |
12 |
10 |
| St. Maurice |
10 |
46 |
9 |
58 |
22 |
20 |
| Yamaska |
10 |
38 |
8 |
10 |
19 |
9 |
| Vercheres |
10 |
38 |
16 |
27 |
20 |
20 |
| Portacuf |
10 |
21 |
8 |
23 |
19 |
3 |
| Terrebonne |
10 |
14 |
11 |
45 |
27 |
.. |
| Dorchester |
9 |
45 |
9 |
22 |
19 |
.. |
It will be seen by this table that the average
yield of wheat is over one-third less in Lower than in Upper Canada.
There are counties in Lower Canada where the production of wheat
must be unprofitable; and the surprise is that it is not abandoned
altogether, or rather that it should have been revived after the
discouragements inflicted by the wheat fly. The average returns
from L'Islet are as low as six bushels an acre; from Gaspe and
Saguenay seven, and Montreal eight. How far these miserable returns
are due to bad cultivation and how far to climate or soil, we
have no means of knowing; but it is certain that for farming purposes
soil that ordinarily produces such meager crops, is not worth
the owning. The soil of the counties in the above list is doubtless
capable of being cultivated to a better purpose than to produce
from nine to fifteen bushels the acre.
In 1850, the Canadas produced, according to the
census returns, 16,202,272 bushels of wheat; of which 12,808,272
was the growth of the Upper and 3,400,000 of the Lower Province.
Taking as guide what has been done in certain cases, there can
be no doubt that the soil under cultivation might be made to produce
about double its present amount. Mr. Hutton calculates the consumption
at five bushels of wheat per head to the population; but there
cannot be a question that he underrates the amount. The best proof
of it is the fact that upon this estimate, he has a surplus of
1,039,610, after deducting the exports. This supposed surplus
unquestionably went into consumption. Even then the consumption
of each individual was only six bushels, which, were it an estimate
instead of a fact, we should have thought it too low.
|